Reflect on each group and their video presentations. What did each group do well? What did each group not do so well? Then explain what it was like to work with a group and your ideas on the technology portion of the project. Did you like it? Why or why not?
Video #1:
This group did a good job by representing all different genders and ages. They interviewed people from children up and through adulthood. They represented stereotypes and non-stereotypes through a flashback skit of the 50s.
This group could have done better with the editing portion. It seemed like there were a few interviews or minor fixes that should have been made. Also, I don't think each member was represented in the video so that would have been nice to see.
This group did a good job by representing all different genders and ages. They interviewed people from children up and through adulthood. They represented stereotypes and non-stereotypes through a flashback skit of the 50s.
This group could have done better with the editing portion. It seemed like there were a few interviews or minor fixes that should have been made. Also, I don't think each member was represented in the video so that would have been nice to see.
Video #2:
This group did a good job by starting out their presentation with an explanation of why they are doing what they are doing. Kind of like a purpose for their video. It helped me understand the presentation better overall. I also liked how some of their interviewees didn't have a chance to think about their answers to the questions because they were run down by an interviewer.
This group could have done better with audio. Because their interviews were so random some of the places they ended up were loud which made it hard to hear as a person watching. Also, this group could have spent a little more time on editing. There seemed to be a few choppy cuts.
This group did a good job by starting out their presentation with an explanation of why they are doing what they are doing. Kind of like a purpose for their video. It helped me understand the presentation better overall. I also liked how some of their interviewees didn't have a chance to think about their answers to the questions because they were run down by an interviewer.
This group could have done better with audio. Because their interviews were so random some of the places they ended up were loud which made it hard to hear as a person watching. Also, this group could have spent a little more time on editing. There seemed to be a few choppy cuts.
Video #3:
This video was my group's. Overall I really enjoyed the project and the way they were presented. I think our directions were kind of open ended which made us think more as a group and come up with our own ideas for our videos. My group worked really well together. We seemed to work together for the mot part and everyone had a job or role. Each person put in their opinion whether it was with the video idea, editing or recording each member was involved. Also I liked how this project wasn't completely research based. We could get information from our previous journals if we needed but the rest was our knowledge. We had little direction which allowed us to go our own ways within our groups. I think the video's were a perfect way to show stereotypes and gender roles.
This group did well with representing each member in their group through voice acknowledgment or a video skit. They also had a good variety of interviewees. Different ages and genders were represented with the help of adolescence, students and teachers. They also had a pretty good flow with the way each interview was cut to answer a specific question rather than a long drawn out interview.
This group could have done better by expanding out to different views on gender roles and answers. The video clips were shorter which caused some repetition of answers from the interviewees.
This video was my group's. Overall I really enjoyed the project and the way they were presented. I think our directions were kind of open ended which made us think more as a group and come up with our own ideas for our videos. My group worked really well together. We seemed to work together for the mot part and everyone had a job or role. Each person put in their opinion whether it was with the video idea, editing or recording each member was involved. Also I liked how this project wasn't completely research based. We could get information from our previous journals if we needed but the rest was our knowledge. We had little direction which allowed us to go our own ways within our groups. I think the video's were a perfect way to show stereotypes and gender roles.
This group did well with representing each member in their group through voice acknowledgment or a video skit. They also had a good variety of interviewees. Different ages and genders were represented with the help of adolescence, students and teachers. They also had a pretty good flow with the way each interview was cut to answer a specific question rather than a long drawn out interview.
This group could have done better by expanding out to different views on gender roles and answers. The video clips were shorter which caused some repetition of answers from the interviewees.